Muas, night blogg

Both these books are quite similar in the fact that they both tell stories about the holocaust and the world war II. One of the similarities that both of these books share is the main characters experience what happens to them in the holocaust in there own way. Like Elie in most of the book was kept in a concentration camp trying to survive and so was Vladek in Maus II during the younger years of his life. Although they were similar stories they were told from a different perspective, in Night it was actually happening while being told and Vladek was telling his story or experience of what happened during it to his son in the Maus books. Another similarity is during both of the books the Germans mock and make fun of the Jews. During Night They would laugh and taunt the Jews while they prayed, also they would beat up on them too. One of the Germans asked Vladek if the wound on his hand had healed then he stabbed it again to re-open the cut and make Vladek suffer in Maus II. One more connection of the books is that in Maus there were side stories of what went on in Vladeks story other than just the Holocaust and in Night the story was written strait through without many side stories. Like Before anything bad happened in the 1930s and 1940s vladek explained out his love life and who he married, but during Night it was all mainly about concentration camps and how they survived the Holocaust. I believe that other schools should read both books because it gives different perspectives of what happened to them during the holocaust and world war two. The nice thing is you get a illustrated version during the Maus books, but Night is more of a descriptive story about what happened to the characters. Students would be able to get through these books quick also because Night isnt a long read and the Maus books are all comics.

Restrepo blog

One thing that helped Restrepo bring Fallen Angels to life is the setting they were in, it was pretty similar other than the rice paddies in Veitnam. The firefights between the Americans and enemies also helped me visualize alot better of what the fighting was like. In Restrepo they showed the men's reactions to one of the friends death which really gave me a great example of how they would of reacted in Fallen Angels. When they went to villages to talk with the locals it helped bring out what talking to vietnamese in the book would have been like. When all of the soldiers had to go to rock avalanche to patrol it totally reminded me of all the night patrols Perry and the rest of there sqaud did. The sergeant dies in Fallen Angels and Restrepo died in the movie which were big losses to both of them, So the important death portrayed very similar of what happened in the book. The helicopters were used in Fallen Angels to fight which killed much of the enemies and the helicopters/planes bombed and fired at the enemy in Restrepo. The movie showed how no position in the valley was safe just like even at camp in Vietnam wasnt to safe. It never said how much or really when people smoked or did tabacco but Restrepo illustrated it well since you could see friends passing tins to each other. At the end they were all excited to go back home and get out of the valley like Perry and Peewee got to get out of Nam for there injuries.

What i learned about war from Fallen Angels and the movie Restrepo is that mainly not everyone will survive no matter how much someone thinks they will. I also learned many tearms, like who the Cong's are and what the hooch is. The book gave me a good descriptive story of what war is like while the movie gave me the illustrative version of the book, other than the settings of the two they seem to be very similar kind of stories. I'd recomend to read first before watching, since the text gives you so many more details.

slaughter house-5

Please list 10 ways you can improve your essay scores

1. Read the whole book                      6. explain out my main points better
2  Listen to Mr. cheng when he explains things                      7 write better explainations of the quotes better
3. think out more thorough thoughts                       8. using better voice, style, and word choice
4. follow along in class discussion for the book                       9. Write better thesis statements
5. effective use quotes                       10. Write better concluding paragraghs


Please write any 15 thoughts about the book Slaughterhouse-5.  For each thought, please refer to a specific part of the book that generated this thought (for instance, “It was funny” receives no credit; “It was funny when he described the Tralfamadorians” receives full credit).

1. The book confused me in way billy always switched life plots

2. It was sad at times because of hearing about alot of deaths

3. It was intriguing becuase i had never heard in full details of life outside earth

4. Good humor was used like when the tralmafadores shafts were explained

5. It was rather weird because Billy was always naked in tralmafadore

6.  It was sexual becuase it talked about him and his wife also with him and Montana

7. Painted pictures in my head because a lot of parts explained the setting well enough like the war

8. Sometimes excititng because you never could guess where billy was going next in his life

9. It was interesting because i learned a new way the world could end

10. Against wars because nothing about it was supported or glorified to make it sound good

11. It taught me new information since i never knew about a bombing in dresden in WWII

12. Would be annoying since Billies daughter bitched at him all the time

13. Unattractive because Billy was not good looking and his wife was fat

14. Needed more details because it didnt say how billy got off tralmafadore

15. Targeted a weird audience since it was random plots of a man through the whole book


State 5 possible themes for the book Slaughterhouse-5.
1. Life and death are a never ending cycle

2. Without sex life can not be created

3. Wars can never be prevented for world peace

4. Time is only what you make of it to be

5. Never will anyone be unstuck in time for a never ending life


Write a conversation between yourself and Billy Pilgrim in which he tries to teach you a lesson based on his own experiences.  You must explain IN DEPTH at least 3 specific events and details from the book in order to receive full credit.  This conversation should go on as long as it takes to demonstrate YOUR UNDERSTANDING of Billy’s experiences.
EXAMPLE:
Billy: Hello, Mr. Cheng
Mr. Cheng: Hi Billy
Billy: Have you heard about Tralfamadore?
Mr. Cheng: No, what’s that?
Billy: It’s a planet where they... etc.

Bo: Whats up Billy?
Billy: Trying to relax, how bout you?
Bo: Nice and same here.
Billy: It sucks more for me because im unstuck in time so i cant always rest when i want too.
Bo: What's unstuck in time?
Billy: Well its where my life never ends, im always switching into different times of my life.
Bo: I see... What would be some examples?
Billy: One time I was having sex with my wife on our honeymoon then I time traveled to when I was a prisoner of World War II. Another time I was trying to survive unarmed in the war, following three other men then I traveled to my basement at home sitting on my typewriter.
Bo: Thats rather a cool thing.
Billy: Its not, my life never ends and i am sick of time travel.

Siddhartha Blog

In the book Siddhartha there are lots of great thoughts which can help throughout your life, I believe that one of the most important thinkings of Siddhartha in the book is that wisdom can not be taught, only knowledge can be shared. "'Are you jesting?' asked Govinda. 'No, I am telling you what I have discorvered. Knowledge can be communicated , but not wisdom. One can find it, live it, be fortified by it, do wonders through it, but one cannot communicate and teach it.'"(p. 142) When Siddhartha explains this to Govinda he cant grasp it all at once, but it makes perfect sense that wisdom is found and gained by taking in and learning knowledge overtime. To have wisdom as a man, gaining knowledge that is taught by another is not the only key. "But one cannot love words. Therefore teachings are of no use to me; they have no hardness, no softness, nor colors, no corners, no smell, no taste-they have nothing but words."(p. 146) Siddhartha truly believes that words are a poor way of gaining knowledge and not enough to find peace especially by others trying to teach it. You have to realize yourself over the time to love things that may seem meaningless then this wisdom will come.